This is why I don't
call myself a feminist.
You can argue all you
like that a 'real' feminist is only in the middle section where the
red and green circles cross. You can also argue that the word 'cool'
REALLY refers to temperature and people who use it to mean 'trendy'
are using the word wrong. It doesn't change the fact that if you say
'Today was cool' I will have NO IDEA if you mean you had a good day
or if you are talking about the weather. If you tell me you are a
feminist I HAVE NO IDEA if you care about gender equality or if you
think men are scum. It tells me you care about women's rights –
that you are in the red circle. It no more indicates that you are
ALSO in the green circle than that you are also in the pink circle.
The point of language
is to communicate with others. The word feminist does not communicate
what you think it should. It could mean too many different things.
It's a woolly word – too broad to be useful. (If you want to
bemoan this fact then I suggest that you speak out against the pink circle not the green
one.)
And another point. If
you say 'Today was cool. I wore my hat'', how can you NOT realise
that wearing a hat implies you are talking about the weather, not
your funky new hat that made you feel great? If you say 'I'm a
feminist. Women need x, y and z.' you are implying that you are using
'feminist' to mean that you care about women's rights NOT gender
rights. I actually believe that the VAST majority of self-proclaimed
feminists are egalitarians. I ALSO believe that most MRAs are
egalitarians. But then, I'm an egalitarian.
If you tell me you are
a feminist – you are NOT indicating that you are an egalitarian –
even if that is your intent. It is not a logical inference to make.
Maybe it sucks, but that's the way it will be unless you manage to
prove feminists are egalitarians - maybe by NOT using sexist language
all the time. Like having campaigns to stop domestic violence rather
than ones to stop domestic violence against women. Which I'm afraid
implies – I assume unintentionally - that hitting men is A-OK.
Laws should not be sexist. Not even accidentally. No person should
be allowed to hit their partner. And yet it's tolerated – even
expected – for a woman to slap her cheating boyfriend's face. I've done
it myself when I was a teenager. (Sorry Dave - you lied to me, hurt me, and treated me very badly - but I had no right to hit you.) No normal western man could possibly
not know that hitting their wife is not ok. MANY women don't realise
it's actually not ok to hit their husbands.
I'm an egalitarian. It's a clearer, cleaner word than feminist. If I want to stress I'm talking about gender rights rather than race, sexuality or something else - then I can call myself a gender egalitarian. I find the word 'feminist' just as jarring as the word 'masculinist'.
So there you go. I am NOT part of the sisterhood - I have a brother, a husband and a son. I believe they should enjoy the same freedoms I have - to choose whether to prioritise family or career, to choose what clothes to wear, whether to grow their hair long or to speak out without being mocked if they are raped or abused.
Welcome to the siblinghood.
So there you go. I am NOT part of the sisterhood - I have a brother, a husband and a son. I believe they should enjoy the same freedoms I have - to choose whether to prioritise family or career, to choose what clothes to wear, whether to grow their hair long or to speak out without being mocked if they are raped or abused.
Welcome to the siblinghood.
No comments:
Post a Comment